![]() ![]() With such similarities it would seem that a researcher could use either app, and indeed both are very useful, but there are distinctive differences between them. Additionally, both apps provide similar annotation tools, such as highlighting, underlining, strikethroughs, typed notes, sticky notes, and freehand drawing. Neither app is integrated with an online bibliographic manager at this point, but since both can use Dropbox, which can be integrated with Zotero or Mendeley, this is not a problem. As well, they can both be linked to multiple cloud services to upload and download files. Both apps can read multiple file formats and provide file management tools like rename, move, and delete. GoodReader and PDF Reader Pro are two apps that provide that capability for iPad users. Today’s researchers are extremely mobile and are looking for ways to read and annotate documents when not in their offices. Laura Pope Robbins is an advisor for The Charleston Advisor, and the comparative review below is included in Scholarly Commons with the permission of the publisher. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |